GBIL : Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF

GBIL is a Alternative Market Short with LOW fees.

GBIL

Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF

FI Score

72 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

10 /10

Expense Rating

9 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,034 Alternative Short funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare GBIL vs FINAX

25% FI Score
  • finax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Franklin International Small Cap Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs FJSIX

25% FI Score
  • fjsix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Nuveen High Income Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs FPCGX

25% FI Score
  • fpcgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Fort Pitt Capital Total Return Fund

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs FRRSX

25% FI Score
  • frrsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Franklin Real Estate Securities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs GLDAX

25% FI Score
  • gldax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Gabelli Gold Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs LMSCX

25% FI Score
  • lmscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Federated Municipal Bond Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs GOPSX

25% FI Score
  • gopsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Aberdeen China A Share Equity Fund Institutional Service Class

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs GRRSX

25% FI Score
  • grrsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

James Alpha Macro Portfolio Class S Shares

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs GSC

25% FI Score
  • gsc
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Broad

GS Connect S&P GSCI Enhanced Commodity Total Return ETN

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs HCMDX

25% FI Score
  • hcmdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

HCM Tactical Growth Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 2.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs HDPMX

25% FI Score
  • hdpmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Hodges Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs HQBRX

25% FI Score
  • hqbrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Hartford Quality Bond Fund Class R3

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs HRSVX

25% FI Score
  • hrsvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Heartland Select Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs HWACX

25% FI Score
  • hwacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs PINOX

25% FI Score
  • pinox
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Putnam International Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs PLAHX

25% FI Score
  • plahx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Pacific Funds High Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs PMOAX

25% FI Score
  • pmoax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Principal Opportunistic Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs INCMX

25% FI Score
  • incmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

FundX Flexible Income Fund

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs JUCTX

25% FI Score
  • juctx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Janus Henderson Absolute Return Income Opportunities Fund - T Shares

Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs LBGAX

25% FI Score
  • lbgax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

ClearBridge Mid Cap Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo