GBIL : Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF

GBIL is a Alternative Market Short with LOW fees.

GBIL

Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF

FI Score

72 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

10 /10

Expense Rating

9 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,034 Alternative Short funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare GBIL vs MSSMX

29% FI Score
  • mssmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Inception Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs KINAX

29% FI Score
  • kinax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Kinetics Internet Advisor Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs SCIF

29% FI Score
  • scif
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • India Stock

VanEck Vectors India Small-Cap Index ETF

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a India Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs KNPYX

29% FI Score
  • knpyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Kinetics Paradigm Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs IIVLX

29% FI Score
  • iivlx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Transamerica Small/Mid Cap Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs LFECX

29% FI Score
  • lfecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

MFS Lifetime 2035 Fund Class C

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs MTCBX

29% FI Score
  • mtcbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

MFS Technology Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs MTCCX

29% FI Score
  • mtccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

MFS Technology Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs LTTCX

29% FI Score
  • lttcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund Class C

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs IIXIX

29% FI Score
  • iixix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Catalyst Insider Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs WGBFX

29% FI Score
  • wgbfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Wells Fargo WealthBuilder Growth Balanced Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs PCHSX

29% FI Score
  • pchsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Putnam Global Health Care Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs SSIFX

29% FI Score
  • ssifx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Sextant International Fund

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs PFRCX

29% FI Score
  • pfrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PIMCO International Bond Fund (Unhedged) Class C

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs NAIGX

29% FI Score
  • naigx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Nuveen NWQ International Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs NBNAX

29% FI Score
  • nbnax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Neuberger Berman International Select Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs NCDCX

29% FI Score
  • ncdcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Conservative Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs GTALX

29% FI Score
  • gtalx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Goldman Sachs Target Date 2035 Portfolio A Shares

Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs NCRCX

29% FI Score
  • ncrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Neuberger Berman Core Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs TPAIX

29% FI Score
  • tpaix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

Timothy Plan Israel Common Values Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo