GBIL : Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF

GBIL is a Alternative Market Short with LOW fees.

GBIL

Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF

FI Score

72 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

10 /10

Expense Rating

9 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,034 Alternative Short funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare GBIL vs IHYAX

31% FI Score
  • ihyax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Voya High Yield Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs IIGCX

31% FI Score
  • iigcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

VanEck International Investors Gold Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs PKSCX

31% FI Score
  • pkscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs PLCSX

31% FI Score
  • plcsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Pacific Funds Short Duration Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs KMED

31% FI Score
  • kmed
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

KraneShares Emerging Markets Healthcare Index ETF

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs LCNIX

31% FI Score
  • lcnix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Lazard International Equity Concentrated Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs PNVAX

31% FI Score
  • pnvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Putnam International Capital Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs RCOCX

31% FI Score
  • rcocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Victory RS Large Cap Alpha Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs PQSCX

31% FI Score
  • pqscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs TEMMX

31% FI Score
  • temmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Templeton Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs RFEM

31% FI Score
  • rfem
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs RIOCX

31% FI Score
  • riocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Columbia Income Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs RMBKX

31% FI Score
  • rmbkx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs RPMVX

31% FI Score
  • rpmvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Reinhart Mid Cap PMV Fund Advisor Class

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs RPXIX

31% FI Score
  • rpxix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

RiverPark Large Growth Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs SEBFX

31% FI Score
  • sebfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Saturna Sustainable Bond Fund

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs SEFIX

31% FI Score
  • sefix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • International

SEI Institutional International Trust International Fixed Income Fund Class F

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a International Bond fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs SINBX

31% FI Score
  • sinbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Federated Strategic Income Fund Class B Shares

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs SINCX

31% FI Score
  • sincx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Federated Strategic Income Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs SIRAX

31% FI Score
  • sirax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Sierra Tactical All Asset Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo