GBIL : Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF

GBIL is a Alternative Market Short with LOW fees.

GBIL

Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF

FI Score

72 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

10 /10

Expense Rating

9 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,034 Alternative Short funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare GBIL vs BUFGX

37% FI Score
  • bufgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Buffalo Growth Fund

Expenses: 0.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs BWG

37% FI Score
  • bwg
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

BrandywineGLOBAL – Global Income Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 3.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs BXTYX

37% FI Score
  • bxtyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Barings Diversified Income Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs QUSOX

37% FI Score
  • qusox
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Small Cap Fund Ordinary Class

Expenses: 1.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs WHYDX

37% FI Score
  • whydx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Wells Fargo High Yield Municipal Bond Fund - Class Admin

Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs CCUGX

37% FI Score
  • ccugx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Principal Government & High Quality Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs RBTRX

37% FI Score
  • rbtrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • International

RBC BlueBay Global Bond Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.69% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a International Bond fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs PGP

37% FI Score
  • pgp
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

PIMCO Global StocksPLUS and Income Fund

Expenses: 2.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs PRCEX

37% FI Score
  • prcex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Principal Real Estate Securities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs PROVX

37% FI Score
  • provx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Provident Trust Strategy Fund

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs PHYIX

37% FI Score
  • phyix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Putnam High Yield Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs MNBCX

37% FI Score
  • mnbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Pioneer AMT-Free Municipal Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs MSOCX

37% FI Score
  • msocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. International Opportunity Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs PUGCX

37% FI Score
  • pugcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Putnam Global Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs CHVCX

37% FI Score
  • chvcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Cullen High Dividend Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs PVQAX

37% FI Score
  • pvqax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

PIMCO RealPath Blend 2045 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs CRMMX

37% FI Score
  • crmmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

CRM Mid Cap Value Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs CTFDX

37% FI Score
  • ctfdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Columbia Thermostat Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs CUT

37% FI Score
  • cut
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF

Expenses: 0.61% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs EDD

37% FI Score
  • edd
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund

Expenses: 3.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo