Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
2 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$GAOSX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- oglnx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Invesco Oppenheimer Global Fund Class R
Expenses: 1.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- mgglx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Opportunity Portfolio Class L
Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- epspx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
MainStay Epoch Global Equity Yield Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- wldr
- ETF
- Allocation
- Total World
Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF
Expenses: 0.47% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- dew
- ETF
- Allocation
- Total World
WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund
Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- abrzx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- cwgcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
American Funds Capital World Growth and Income Fund® Class C
Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- sbalx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Victory Strategic Allocation Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- scgvx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Sands Capital Global Growth Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »