FUTS : Future Science Holdings Inc

FUTS is a Other Market with HIGH fees.

FUTS

Future Science Holdings Inc

FI Score

72 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

10 /10

Market Score

10 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

10 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,484 Other funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare FUTS vs VTAIX

42% FI Score
  • vtaix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Virtus Tactical Allocation Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs RSEFX

42% FI Score
  • rsefx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Royce Special Equity Fund Service Class

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs AAAAX

42% FI Score
  • aaaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs ARSQX

42% FI Score
  • arsqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Aristotle Value Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs GCSAX

42% FI Score
  • gcsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Goldman Sachs Small Cap Equity Insights Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs ONLN

42% FI Score
  • onln
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclicals

ProShares Online Retail ETF

Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclicals Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs EUDV

42% FI Score
  • eudv
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

ProShares MSCI Europe Dividend Growers ETF

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs EUM

42% FI Score
  • eum
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs AUXIX

42% FI Score
  • auxix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Auxier Focus Fund Institutional

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs MWFLX

42% FI Score
  • mwflx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Metropolitan West Floating Rate Income Fund Class I Shares

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs SZIAX

42% FI Score
  • sziax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

DWS Total Return Bond Fund - Class A

Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs OOSNX

42% FI Score
  • oosnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Senior Floating Rate Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs MVGAX

42% FI Score
  • mvgax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs OLCAX

42% FI Score
  • olcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Rochester Limited Term California Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs BCRCX

42% FI Score
  • bcrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

BlackRock CoreAlpha Bond Fund Investor C Shares

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs MSGFX

42% FI Score
  • msgfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Franchise Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs RSGGX

42% FI Score
  • rsggx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Victory RS Global Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs MSACX

42% FI Score
  • msacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio Class I

Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs VIXM

42% FI Score
  • vixm
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Volatility

ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF

Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Volatility Alternative fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs CNDAX

42% FI Score
  • cndax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Columbia Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo