FUTS : Future Science Holdings Inc

FUTS is a Other Market with HIGH fees.

FUTS

Future Science Holdings Inc

FI Score

72 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

10 /10

Market Score

10 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

10 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,484 Other funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare FUTS vs FNGO

42% FI Score
  • fngo
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs VIXM

42% FI Score
  • vixm
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Volatility

ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF

Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Volatility Alternative fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs EVIFX

42% FI Score
  • evifx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Eaton Vance Balanced Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs ETGLX

42% FI Score
  • etglx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Eventide Gilead Class N

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs CWVIX

42% FI Score
  • cwvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Calvert International Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs BLDFX

42% FI Score
  • bldfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Blackrock Low Duration Bond Portfolio Investor C3 Shares

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs STHRX

42% FI Score
  • sthrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Wells Fargo Target 2030 Fund - Class A

Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs ESEAX

42% FI Score
  • eseax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital Select Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs MNBIX

42% FI Score
  • mnbix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series Class I

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs WFDAX

42% FI Score
  • wfdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Wells Fargo Discovery Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs JCAFX

42% FI Score
  • jcafx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

John Hancock California Tax Free Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs RSGGX

42% FI Score
  • rsggx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Victory RS Global Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs DIFCX

42% FI Score
  • difcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

MFS Diversified Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs BEMAX

42% FI Score
  • bemax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Brandes Emerging Markets Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs WRLDX

42% FI Score
  • wrldx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Scharf Global Opportunity Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs RPEAX

42% FI Score
  • rpeax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Davis Opportunity Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs SPICX

42% FI Score
  • spicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Invesco S&P 500 Index Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs OOSAX

42% FI Score
  • oosax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Senior Floating Rate Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs HAFIX

42% FI Score
  • hafix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Hartford AARP Balanced Retirement Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.61% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs EAGMX

42% FI Score
  • eagmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo