FUTS : Future Science Holdings Inc

FUTS is a Other Market with HIGH fees.

FUTS

Future Science Holdings Inc

FI Score

72 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

10 /10

Market Score

10 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

10 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,484 Other funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare FUTS vs FLQM

44% FI Score
  • flqm
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF

Expenses: 0.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs HRLYX

44% FI Score
  • hrlyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs MMHCX

44% FI Score
  • mmhcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

MFS Municipal High Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs TEMQX

44% FI Score
  • temqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Franklin Mutual Quest Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs SMLCX

44% FI Score
  • smlcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

DWS Managed Municipal Bond Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs OTCCX

44% FI Score
  • otccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs OSMCX

44% FI Score
  • osmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Invesco Oppenheimer International Small-Mid Company Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs MHITX

44% FI Score
  • mhitx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

MFS High Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs GMSAX

44% FI Score
  • gmsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs FKBSX

44% FI Score
  • fkbsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Federated Kaufmann Small Cap Fund Class B Shares

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs FLATX

44% FI Score
  • flatx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Latin America Stock

Fidelity® Latin America Fund

Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Latin America Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs FKRCX

44% FI Score
  • fkrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs OSGCX

44% FI Score
  • osgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

JPMorgan Small Cap Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs FKCSX

44% FI Score
  • fkcsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Federated Kaufmann Small Cap Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs PRRAX

44% FI Score
  • prrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Principal Real Estate Securities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs OCMIX

44% FI Score
  • ocmix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Invesco Select Risk: Moderate Investor Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs ECASX

44% FI Score
  • ecasx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs PRRJX

44% FI Score
  • prrjx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Putnam RetirementReady 2050 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs MCNKX

44% FI Score
  • mcnkx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

BlackRock New York Municipal Opportunities Fund Investor C1 Shares

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs MCAGX

44% FI Score
  • mcagx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

MFS Aggressive Growth Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo