Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
2 /10
Market Score
10 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
10 /10
$FTFQX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 8,623 Bond Municipal Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- fevix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
First Eagle U.S. Value Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- hilix
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Value
Hartford International Value Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
- fblax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Franklin Managed Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- cmnwx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Principal Capital Appreciation Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- bladx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
BlackRock Managed Income Fund Investor A Shares
Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- botz
- ETF
- Allocation
- Other
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF
Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »
- gwpcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
American Funds Growth Portfolio Class C
Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- icivx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternative
- Short
Invesco Conservative Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »
- jscsx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
JPMorgan U.S. Small Company Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »