FSWCX : Fidelity® SAI U.S. Value Index Fund

FSWCX is a US Stocks Market Large Value index fund with LOW fees.

FSWCX

Fidelity® SAI U.S. Value Index Fund

FI Score

84 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

10 /10

Expense Rating

9 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,043 US Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare FSWCX vs AGICX

16% FI Score
  • agicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

AB Tax-Managed All Market Income Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FSWCX vs GGECX

16% FI Score
  • ggecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Nationwide Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FSWCX vs PUDBX

16% FI Score
  • pudbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

PGIM Real Assets Fund- Class B

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FSWCX vs ARTCX

16% FI Score
  • artcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

AllianzGI Multi Asset Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FSWCX vs JMNSX

16% FI Score
  • jmnsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

JPMorgan Research Market Neutral Fund Class I

Expenses: 3.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare FSWCX vs DAREX

16% FI Score
  • darex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Dunham Real Estate Stock Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare FSWCX vs DAHYX

16% FI Score
  • dahyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Dunham High-Yield Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FSWCX vs SMSVX

16% FI Score
  • smsvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Multi-Sector Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FSWCX vs PWRIX

16% FI Score
  • pwrix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Power Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FSWCX vs GAMDX

16% FI Score
  • gamdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Goldman Sachs Local Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FSWCX vs ICBMX

16% FI Score
  • icbmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Industrials

ICON Natural Resources Fund Class S

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FSWCX vs KWINX

16% FI Score
  • kwinx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Kinetics Alternative Income Fund No Load Class

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FSWCX vs CFRAX

16% FI Score
  • cfrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Catalyst Floating Rate Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FSWCX vs RYLSX

16% FI Score
  • rylsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclical

Rydex Leisure Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclical Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FSWCX vs OEMCX

16% FI Score
  • oemcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FSWCX vs APRAX

16% FI Score
  • aprax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

AAM/Phocas Real Estate Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare FSWCX vs JETAX

16% FI Score
  • jetax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Aberdeen Global Equity Impact Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FSWCX vs AOPCX

16% FI Score
  • aopcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

AllianzGI International Small-Cap Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FSWCX vs RAGHX

16% FI Score
  • raghx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

AllianzGI Health Sciences Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FSWCX vs APITX

16% FI Score
  • apitx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Yorktown Growth Fund Class L

Expenses: 2.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs up duo thumbs down duo