FSWCX : Fidelity® SAI U.S. Value Index Fund

FSWCX is a US Stocks Market Large Value index fund with LOW fees.

FSWCX

Fidelity® SAI U.S. Value Index Fund

FI Score

84 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

10 /10

Expense Rating

9 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,043 US Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare FSWCX vs HICMX

38% FI Score
  • hicmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Pioneer High Income Municipal Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FSWCX vs GSBCX

38% FI Score
  • gsbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FSWCX vs GTDCX

38% FI Score
  • gtdcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Invesco Developing Markets Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FSWCX vs TNTIX

38% FI Score
  • tntix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Dupree Mutual Fund Tennessee Tax-Free Income Fund

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FSWCX vs TOLCX

38% FI Score
  • tolcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Global Equity

DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure Fund - Class C

Expenses: 2.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Global Equity Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FSWCX vs NITFX

38% FI Score
  • nitfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Aquila Narragansett Tax-Free Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FSWCX vs HIX

38% FI Score
  • hix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Western Asset High Income Fund II

Expenses: 2.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FSWCX vs TRAOX

38% FI Score
  • traox
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

T. Rowe Price Asia Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FSWCX vs HAHIX

38% FI Score
  • hahix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford High Yield Fund Institutional

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FSWCX vs JRS

38% FI Score
  • jrs
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Nuveen Real Estate Income Fund

Expenses: 2.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare FSWCX vs UPMMX

38% FI Score
  • upmmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund Adviser Shares

Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FSWCX vs HJPNX

38% FI Score
  • hjpnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Japan Stock

Hennessy Japan Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FSWCX vs OAREX

38% FI Score
  • oarex
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Oakmark International Small Cap Service Class

Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FSWCX vs OCACX

38% FI Score
  • ocacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Rochester California Municipal Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FSWCX vs OPNYX

38% FI Score
  • opnyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Rochester AMT-Free New York Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FSWCX vs USEMX

38% FI Score
  • usemx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

USAA Emerging Markets Fund

Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FSWCX vs URTAX

38% FI Score
  • urtax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

JPMorgan Realty Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare FSWCX vs VCRIX

38% FI Score
  • vcrix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Global Equity

MainStay CBRE Global Infrastructure Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Global Equity Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FSWCX vs JGH

38% FI Score
  • jgh
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Nuveen Global High Income Fund

Expenses: 2.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FSWCX vs PAEMX

38% FI Score
  • paemx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PIMCO Emerging Markets Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs up duo thumbs down duo