FSRBX : Fidelity® Select Banking Portfolio

FSRBX is a Sector Equity Market Financial Services with MODERATE fees.

FSRBX

Fidelity® Select Banking Portfolio

FI Score

46 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

2 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,815 Sector Equity Financial Services funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare FSRBX vs PFIAX

47% FI Score
  • pfiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PIMCO Low Duration Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FSRBX vs ALARX

47% FI Score
  • alarx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Alger Capital Appreciation Institutional Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FSRBX vs ALNYX

47% FI Score
  • alnyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

AB Municipal Income Fund New York Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FSRBX vs AMZA

47% FI Score
  • amza
  • ETF
  • Other
  • Master Limited Partnership

InfraCap MLP ETF

Expenses: 2.41% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Master Limited Partnership Other fund. See why »

Compare FSRBX vs NAWGX

47% FI Score
  • nawgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Voya Global High Dividend Low Volatility Fund A

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FSRBX vs NBMTX

47% FI Score
  • nbmtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund Trust Class

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FSRBX vs NEARX

47% FI Score
  • nearx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

U.S. Global Investors Near-Term Tax Free Fund

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FSRBX vs ARBNX

47% FI Score
  • arbnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

The Arbitrage Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare FSRBX vs ARGFX

47% FI Score
  • argfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Ariel Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FSRBX vs ASDVX

47% FI Score
  • asdvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

American Century Short Duration Strategic Income Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FSRBX vs NSTRX

47% FI Score
  • nstrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Columbia Short Term Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FSRBX vs SYV

47% FI Score
  • syv
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

SPDR MFS Systematic Value Equity ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FSRBX vs ASHS

47% FI Score
  • ashs
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China-A Shares Small Cap ETF

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FSRBX vs ASHX

47% FI Score
  • ashx
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FSRBX vs OAKGX

47% FI Score
  • oakgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Oakmark Global Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FSRBX vs SUIIX

47% FI Score
  • suiix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

DWS CROCI International Fund - Class Inst

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FSRBX vs OPER

47% FI Score
  • oper
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Short

ClearShares Ultra-Short Maturity ETF

Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare FSRBX vs OSINX

47% FI Score
  • osinx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Strategic Income Class R

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare FSRBX vs BASBX

47% FI Score
  • basbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Brown Advisory Sustainable Bond Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare FSRBX vs BAWAX

47% FI Score
  • bawax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Advisor Shares

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo