Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
3 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$FSPTX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 131 Sector Equity Technology funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- irbo
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Technology
iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence ETF
Expenses: 0.47% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- nwjcx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Technology
Nationwide NYSE Arca Tech 100 Index Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- dtec
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Technology
ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- aio
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Technology
AllianzGI AI & Tech Opportunities Fund
Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- ihak
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Technology
iShares Cybersecurity and Tech ETF
Expenses: 0.47% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- slmcx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Technology
Columbia Seligman Communications and Information Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- arkw
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Technology
ARK Next Generation Internet ETF
Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- gdat
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Technology
Goldman Sachs Data-Driven World ETF
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- ptf
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Technology
Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »