Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
6 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
7 /10
$FSMVX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 178 US Stocks Mid-Cap Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- rpmvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
Reinhart Mid Cap PMV Fund Advisor Class
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- fcbsx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
Franklin Mutual U.S. Value Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- hmvrx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
Hartford MidCap Value Fund Class R3
Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- mrvix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
BMO Mid-Cap Value Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- fasex
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- tmfcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
Touchstone Mid Cap Value Class C
Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- sprax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
PGIM QMA Mid-Cap Value Fund- Class A
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- sevpx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
Guggenheim SMid Cap Value Fund Class P
Expenses: 1.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- iivlx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
Transamerica Small/Mid Cap Value Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »