Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
2 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$FSAHX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- dibax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
BNY Mellon International Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- gfrcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Goldman Sachs High Yield Floating Rate Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- vslax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Senior Loan Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mggyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Mirova Global Green Bond Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- shiax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Western Asset Short Duration High Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- emkcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Ashmore Emerging Markets Total Return Fund C Class
Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- iixix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Catalyst Insider Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- cubax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Calvert Flexible Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- prvbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Permanent Portfolio Versatile Bond Portfolio Class I
Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »