FPL : First Trust New Opps MLP & Energy Fund

FPL is a Other Market Master Limited Partnership with HIGH fees.

FPL

First Trust New Opps MLP & Energy Fund

FI Score

47 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

10 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

10 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,484 Other Master Limited Partnership funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare FPL vs HCACX

46% FI Score
  • hcacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

The Hartford Capital Appreciation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FPL vs PUDZX

46% FI Score
  • pudzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

PGIM Real Assets Fund- Class Z

Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FPL vs CZA

46% FI Score
  • cza
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF

Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FPL vs STVTX

46% FI Score
  • stvtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Virtus Ceredex Large-Cap Value Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FPL vs MMIBX

46% FI Score
  • mmibx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

MFS Municipal Income Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FPL vs TIBCX

46% FI Score
  • tibcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.87% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FPL vs FLADX

46% FI Score
  • fladx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Franklin LifeSmart™ 2040 Retirement Target Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.34% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FPL vs CHIX

46% FI Score
  • chix
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Global X MSCI China Financials ETF

Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FPL vs PDSZX

46% FI Score
  • pdszx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

PGIM Short Duration Muni Fund- Class Z

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FPL vs RLTSX

46% FI Score
  • rltsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

RiverFront Asset Allocation Aggressive Class Investor II

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FPL vs ACGKX

46% FI Score
  • acgkx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Invesco Growth and Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FPL vs CSB

46% FI Score
  • csb
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

VictoryShares US Small Cap High Div Volatility Wtd ETF

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FPL vs QID

46% FI Score
  • qid
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraShort QQQ

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare FPL vs QCLN

46% FI Score
  • qcln
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Other

First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FPL vs RAIIX

46% FI Score
  • raiix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Manning & Napier Rainier International Discovery Series Class I

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FPL vs MATFX

46% FI Score
  • matfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Matthews Asia Innovators Fund Investor Class Shares

Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FPL vs CSMZX

46% FI Score
  • csmzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund Class Y

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FPL vs PTSNX

46% FI Score
  • ptsnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

PIMCO Short Term Fund I-3

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare FPL vs BUFTX

46% FI Score
  • buftx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Buffalo Discovery Fund

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FPL vs FFTGX

46% FI Score
  • fftgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Salient Tactical Growth Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo