FMAT : Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF

FMAT is a Sector Equity Market Basic Materials with LOW fees.

FMAT

Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF

FI Score

62 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

10 /10

Expense Rating

9 /10

Market Score

4 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

4 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,815 Sector Equity Basic Materials funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare FMAT vs PROTX

29% FI Score
  • protx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Probabilities Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare FMAT vs PLHCX

29% FI Score
  • plhcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

PGIM QMA Long-Short Equity Fund-Class C

Expenses: 2.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare FMAT vs ICEWX

29% FI Score
  • icewx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

MainStay Epoch International Choice Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FMAT vs NCRCX

29% FI Score
  • ncrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Neuberger Berman Core Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare FMAT vs LZFIX

29% FI Score
  • lzfix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Lazard Equity Franchise Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FMAT vs NAIGX

29% FI Score
  • naigx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Nuveen NWQ International Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FMAT vs GTALX

29% FI Score
  • gtalx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Goldman Sachs Target Date 2035 Portfolio A Shares

Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FMAT vs NCDCX

29% FI Score
  • ncdcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Conservative Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FMAT vs NBNAX

29% FI Score
  • nbnax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Neuberger Berman International Select Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FMAT vs PTBCX

29% FI Score
  • ptbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Principal Tax-Exempt Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.67% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FMAT vs GGRAX

29% FI Score
  • ggrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FMAT vs BAQAX

29% FI Score
  • baqax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Brown Advisory Emerging Markets Select Fund Advisor Shares

Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FMAT vs NIMAX

29% FI Score
  • nimax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Neuberger Berman Municipal Impact Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FMAT vs ECTVX

29% FI Score
  • ectvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FMAT vs GTADX

29% FI Score
  • gtadx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Goldman Sachs Target Date 2025 Portfolio A Shares

Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FMAT vs AFVDX

29% FI Score
  • afvdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Applied Finance Dividend Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FMAT vs MCCAX

29% FI Score
  • mccax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

MFS California Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FMAT vs ARGVX

29% FI Score
  • argvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2060 Portfolio Investor Class

Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FMAT vs NMDMX

29% FI Score
  • nmdmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Columbia Maryland Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FMAT vs NMHAX

29% FI Score
  • nmhax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo