Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
3 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
1 /10
$FLRT Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- gscdx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bxhyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Barings U.S. High Yield Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- emkcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Ashmore Emerging Markets Total Return Fund C Class
Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- sccpx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Sterling Capital Corporate Fund Institutional shares
Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- jphcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
JPMorgan Floating Rate Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- phcix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Virtus Newfleet High Yield Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- minc
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
AdvisorShares Newfleet Multi-Sector Income ETF
Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- iixix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Catalyst Insider Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pfrcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO International Bond Fund (Unhedged) Class C
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »