Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
2 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$FLGE Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 643 US Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- elgcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- jpfsx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
JPMorgan Equity Focus Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- jpecx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
JPMorgan Tax Aware Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- arttx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Artisan Focus Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ryhox
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Rydex NASDAQ-100® Fund Class H
Expenses: 1.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- bfthx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Baron Fifth Avenue Growth Fund Retail Class
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ekoax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Wells Fargo Omega Growth Fund - Class A
Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- adsix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
American Century Disciplined Growth Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- wvalx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Weitz Value Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »