Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$FHYCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- ihfax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Integrity High Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- iidex
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Voya Diversified Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ahyvx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
American Century High-Yield Fund A Class
Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- epbix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
EuroPac International Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- emtcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Transamerica Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dmo
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Western Asset Mortgage Defined Opportunity Fund Inc.
Expenses: 3.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dpfcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Deer Park Total Return Credit Fund Class C
Expenses: 3.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- alhcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
AB Limited Duration High Income Portfolio Class C
Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- flrcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Pioneer Floating Rate Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »