Expense Ratio Rating
10 /10
Expense Rating
10 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$FHMFX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- ghyg
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nusa
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Nuveen Enhanced Yield 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bbsgx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.43% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fhisx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Federated High Income Bond Fund Class IS Shares
Expenses: 0.64% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- lasyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Loomis Sayles Strategic Alpha Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bsjo
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.42% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bsct
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pyemx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Payden Emerging Markets Bond Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.72% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- gtrax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PGIM Global Total Return Fund - Class A
Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »