FHLC : Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF

FHLC is a Sector Equity Market Healthcare with LOW fees.

FHLC

Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF

FI Score

82 /100

Diversification Rating

10 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

10 /10

Expense Rating

9 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,815 Sector Equity Healthcare funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare FHLC vs IUSS

48% FI Score
  • iuss
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Invesco RAFI Strategic US Small Company ETF

Expenses: 0.23% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FHLC vs JBLBX

48% FI Score
  • jblbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Balanced Portfolio Class B

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FHLC vs JCLBX

48% FI Score
  • jclbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Balanced Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FHLC vs JDGTX

48% FI Score
  • jdgtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Janus Henderson Global Income Managed Volatility Fund Class T

Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FHLC vs JMUTX

48% FI Score
  • jmutx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Janus Henderson Multi-Sector Income Fund Class T

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare FHLC vs JOF

48% FI Score
  • jof
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Japan Stock

Japan Smaller Capitalization Fund

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FHLC vs LCGRX

48% FI Score
  • lcgrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FHLC vs LEISX

48% FI Score
  • leisx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Federated Equity Income Fund, Inc. Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FHLC vs LGRCX

48% FI Score
  • lgrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FHLC vs SHYL

48% FI Score
  • shyl
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FHLC vs POBAX

48% FI Score
  • pobax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FHLC vs PQTNX

48% FI Score
  • pqtnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class I-3

Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare FHLC vs TWMIX

48% FI Score
  • twmix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

American Century Emerging Markets Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FHLC vs PRRWX

48% FI Score
  • prrwx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Putnam RetirementReady 2035 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FHLC vs RWGV

48% FI Score
  • rwgv
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Direxion Russell 1000 Growth Over Value ETF

Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FHLC vs SDOW

48% FI Score
  • sdow
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare FHLC vs SMGAX

48% FI Score
  • smgax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Allocation Fund Class F

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FHLC vs SQQQ

48% FI Score
  • sqqq
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare FHLC vs SVTAX

48% FI Score
  • svtax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

SEI Institutional Managed Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund Class F

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FHLC vs TGRIX

48% FI Score
  • tgrix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

American Century International Growth Fund I Class

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs up duo thumbs down duo