Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
7 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
4 /10
We found 9,682 Allocation Target-Date funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
DoubleLine Long Duration Total Return Bond Fund Class N
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
Cullen Small Cap Value Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »
The Investment House Growth Fund
Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
BNY Mellon Opportunistic Municipal Securities Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Parametric TABS Short-Term Municipal Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Putnam Global Technology Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2024 Adam Fortuna
Site Map