Expense Ratio Rating
0 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$FGFCX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,369 International Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- mayhx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
BlackRock High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pocax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- fcpex
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Fidelity® Small Cap Enhanced Index Fund
Expenses: 0.64% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- cgw
- ETF
- Allocation
- Other
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF
Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »
- oggfx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
JPMorgan Small Cap Growth Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- pph
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Healthcare
VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF
Expenses: 0.36% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »
- cisgx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Touchstone Sands Capital Institutional Growth Fund
Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- prnyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
T. Rowe Price New York Tax-Free Bond Fund
Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dblgx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
DoubleLine Global Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »