Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
4 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$FGCSX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- waarx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Western Asset Total Return Unconstrained Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- emhy
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pfig
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.22% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- wbffx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
American Funds Capital World Bond Fund® Class F-1
Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mixix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
MainStay Short Term Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ibce
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
iShares iBonds Mar 2023 Term Corporate ex-Financials ETF
Expenses: 0.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mghyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
DWS Global High Income Fund - Class Inst
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ekhix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Wells Fargo High Yield Bond Fund - Class Inst
Expenses: 0.53% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- rpibx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »