Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
8 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
8 /10
$FFECX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 566 US Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- qlc
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund
Expenses: 0.32% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- svaax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Federated Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A Shares
Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- eplcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
MainStay Epoch U.S. Equity Yield Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- tweax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
American Century Equity Income Fund A Class
Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- fdsax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
AIG Focused Dividend Strategy Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- jvaax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
JPMorgan Value Advantage Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- rfda
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF
Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- inutx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Columbia Dividend Opportunity Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- lvhb
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Innovator Lunt Low Vol/High Beta Tactical ETF
Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »