Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
7 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
2 /10
$FEKFX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 566 US Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- qblvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Federated MDT Large Cap Value Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- pnecx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
AllianzGI Dividend Value Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- pbeax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
PGIM Jennison Value Fund- Class A
Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- hwlax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- auxfx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Auxier Focus Fund Class Investor
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- dqicx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
BNY Mellon Equity Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- gsgrx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Goldman Sachs Equity Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- mhiex
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Miller/Howard Income-Equity Fund Class I Shares
Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- kcvix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Value Fund I Class
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »