Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
3 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$FDIVX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,394 International Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- mwhix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Metropolitan West High Yield Bond Fund Class Institutional
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- accbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Corporate Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- oeicx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
JPMorgan Equity Index Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- oaklx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Oakmark Select Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- oaywx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Oakmark Global Select Fund Class Advisor
Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- oincx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
JPMorgan Equity Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- phyex
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PGIM High Yield Fund- Class R2
Expenses: 0.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pgbax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Principal Global Diversified Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- alvax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
American Beacon Large Cap Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »