FCSSX : Fidelity® Series Commodity Strategy Fund

FCSSX is a Commodities Market Broad with LOW fees.

FCSSX

Fidelity® Series Commodity Strategy Fund

FI Score

86 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

10 /10

Expense Rating

10 /10

Market Score

10 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

10 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,417 Commodities Broad funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare FCSSX vs LSTOX

16% FI Score
  • lstox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Lazard Global Strategic Equity Portfolio Open Shares

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs JSVIX

16% FI Score
  • jsvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

James Alpha Structured Credit Value Portfolio Class I

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs RAGHX

16% FI Score
  • raghx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

AllianzGI Health Sciences Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs GWSAX

16% FI Score
  • gwsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Gabelli Focus Five Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs JETAX

16% FI Score
  • jetax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Aberdeen Global Equity Impact Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs HEQFX

16% FI Score
  • heqfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Monteagle Opportunity Equity Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs LCDAX

16% FI Score
  • lcdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Lord Abbett Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs CVLFX

16% FI Score
  • cvlfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Cullen Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs AFTCX

16% FI Score
  • aftcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Invesco Balanced-Risk Retirement 2020 Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs IPBCX

16% FI Score
  • ipbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Wells Fargo Real Return Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs PWREX

16% FI Score
  • pwrex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Pioneer Real Estate Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs NEEGX

16% FI Score
  • neegx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Needham Growth Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs KWINX

16% FI Score
  • kwinx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Kinetics Alternative Income Fund No Load Class

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs RYLSX

16% FI Score
  • rylsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclical

Rydex Leisure Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclical Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs ICBMX

16% FI Score
  • icbmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Industrials

ICON Natural Resources Fund Class S

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs RYMGX

16% FI Score
  • rymgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs RYTIX

16% FI Score
  • rytix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Rydex Technology Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs OEMCX

16% FI Score
  • oemcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs SMSVX

16% FI Score
  • smsvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Multi-Sector Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs SNWAX

16% FI Score
  • snwax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Snow Capital Small Cap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs up duo thumbs down duo