FCSSX : Fidelity® Series Commodity Strategy Fund

FCSSX is a Commodities Market Broad with LOW fees.

FCSSX

Fidelity® Series Commodity Strategy Fund

FI Score

86 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

10 /10

Expense Rating

10 /10

Market Score

10 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

10 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,417 Commodities Broad funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare FCSSX vs MMEAX

19% FI Score
  • mmeax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Victory Integrity Discovery Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs LSMCX

19% FI Score
  • lsmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Columbia Disciplined Small Core Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs DCSCX

19% FI Score
  • dcscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Davis Appreciation & Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs HOTFX

19% FI Score
  • hotfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

FundX Aggressive Upgrader Fund

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs LPBAX

19% FI Score
  • lpbax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic 2025 Fund Investor A Shares

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs VNDFX

19% FI Score
  • vndfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Viking Tax-Free Fund for North Dakota Class A

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs CSGTX

19% FI Score
  • csgtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Transamerica Small Cap Growth C

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs HWCCX

19% FI Score
  • hwccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Hotchkis & Wiley Diversified Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs PXRIX

19% FI Score
  • pxrix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Virtus Duff & Phelps International Real Estate Securities Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs ECIGX

19% FI Score
  • ecigx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Parametric Tax-Managed International Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs MFMIX

19% FI Score
  • mfmix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Frontier Markets Portfolio Class I

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs MGILX

19% FI Score
  • mgilx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Corporate Bond Portfolio Class L

Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs HGDIX

19% FI Score
  • hgdix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

AAM/HIMCO Global Enhanced Dividend Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs MINYX

19% FI Score
  • minyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Madison International Stock Fund Class Y

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs MIOFX

19% FI Score
  • miofx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Marsico International Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs IGTCX

19% FI Score
  • igtcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Transamerica Dynamic Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.67% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs MSADX

19% FI Score
  • msadx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Strategic Income Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs IEMCX

19% FI Score
  • iemcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Invesco Emerging Markets Select Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs MIFIX

19% FI Score
  • mifix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Miller Intermediate Bond Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs PYCEX

19% FI Score
  • pycex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs up duo thumbs down duo