FCSSX : Fidelity® Series Commodity Strategy Fund

FCSSX is a Commodities Market Broad with LOW fees.

FCSSX

Fidelity® Series Commodity Strategy Fund

FI Score

86 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

10 /10

Expense Rating

10 /10

Market Score

10 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

10 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,417 Commodities Broad funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare FCSSX vs EZJ

23% FI Score
  • ezj
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs BERCX

23% FI Score
  • bercx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Chartwell Mid Cap Value Fund

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs DALVX

23% FI Score
  • dalvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Dunham Large Cap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs DHYCX

23% FI Score
  • dhycx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

BNY Mellon High Yield Municipal Bond Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs GABTX

23% FI Score
  • gabtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Communication Services

Gabelli Global Content & Connectivity Fund Class AAA

Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Communication Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs GAGVX

23% FI Score
  • gagvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Goldman Sachs Blue Chip Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs ECLN

23% FI Score
  • ecln
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Utilities

First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs EEHIX

23% FI Score
  • eehix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

AXS Alternative Growth Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs CTASX

23% FI Score
  • ctasx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs EMDZX

23% FI Score
  • emdzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund-Class Z

Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs BGMAX

23% FI Score
  • bgmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

BMO Mid-Cap Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs AZMCX

23% FI Score
  • azmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

AllianzGI Emerging Markets Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs LMYIX

23% FI Score
  • lmyix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

BrandywineGLOBAL - Global High Yield Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs LOTCX

23% FI Score
  • lotcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

LoCorr Market Trend Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs LPBIX

23% FI Score
  • lpbix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic 2025 Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs LPCKX

23% FI Score
  • lpckx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic 2040 Fund Investor C Shares

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs MCNYX

23% FI Score
  • mcnyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

MFS New York Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs LPCNX

23% FI Score
  • lpcnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic 2030 Fund Investor C Shares

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs GGEAX

23% FI Score
  • ggeax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Nationwide Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs LSTIX

23% FI Score
  • lstix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Lazard Global Strategic Equity Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs up duo thumbs down duo