FCSSX : Fidelity® Series Commodity Strategy Fund

FCSSX is a Commodities Market Broad with LOW fees.

FCSSX

Fidelity® Series Commodity Strategy Fund

FI Score

86 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

10 /10

Expense Rating

10 /10

Market Score

10 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

10 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,417 Commodities Broad funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare FCSSX vs DMBCX

25% FI Score
  • dmbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

BNY Mellon Opportunistic Municipal Securities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs EACOX

25% FI Score
  • eacox
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs DNFGX

25% FI Score
  • dnfgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs DRIV

25% FI Score
  • driv
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Other

Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF

Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs DTGRX

25% FI Score
  • dtgrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs EADOX

25% FI Score
  • eadox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs ECBSX

25% FI Score
  • ecbsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Parametric TABS Short-Term Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs ECEAX

25% FI Score
  • eceax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs EFGIX

25% FI Score
  • efgix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Focused Global Opportunities Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs EISEX

25% FI Score
  • eisex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Eaton Vance Special Equities Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs EMEAX

25% FI Score
  • emeax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs EPGIX

25% FI Score
  • epgix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

EuroPac Gold Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs ESGEX

25% FI Score
  • esgex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Reynders McVeigh Core Equity Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs ESVIX

25% FI Score
  • esvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Global Small-Cap Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs ETEGX

25% FI Score
  • etegx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs ETNDX

25% FI Score
  • etndx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Eventide Dividend Opportunities Fund Class N Shares

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs EURL

25% FI Score
  • eurl
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Direxion Daily FTSE Europe Bull 3X Shares

Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs FADVX

25% FI Score
  • fadvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Frost Value Equity Fund Investor Class Shares

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs FBTDX

25% FI Score
  • fbtdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Franklin Biotechnology Discovery Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs FGSCX

25% FI Score
  • fgscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Federated MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs up duo thumbs down duo