FCSSX : Fidelity® Series Commodity Strategy Fund

FCSSX is a Commodities Market Broad with LOW fees.

FCSSX

Fidelity® Series Commodity Strategy Fund

FI Score

86 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

10 /10

Expense Rating

10 /10

Market Score

10 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

10 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,417 Commodities Broad funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare FCSSX vs HYLS

37% FI Score
  • hyls
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs AFSM

37% FI Score
  • afsm
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs ACP

37% FI Score
  • acp
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Aberdeen Income Credit Strategies Fund

Expenses: 3.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs FGNCX

37% FI Score
  • fgncx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Global Equity

Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Global Equity Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs PTEBX

37% FI Score
  • ptebx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

BNY Mellon Opportunistic Municipal Securities Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs GFIN

37% FI Score
  • gfin
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Goldman Sachs Finance Reimagined ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs SDVY

37% FI Score
  • sdvy
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

First Trust SMID Cap Rising Dividend Achievers ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs ASUAX

37% FI Score
  • asuax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

AllianzGI Global Sustainability Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs EIRRX

37% FI Score
  • eirrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs LLGLX

37% FI Score
  • llglx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Longleaf Partners Global Fund

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs FGFBX

37% FI Score
  • fgfbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Federated International Leaders Fund Class B Shares

Expenses: 2.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs LFMAX

37% FI Score
  • lfmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

LoCorr Macro Strategies Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs FSRFX

37% FI Score
  • fsrfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Industrials

Fidelity® Select Transportation Portfolio

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs TDFAX

37% FI Score
  • tdfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Transamerica Dividend Focused Class A

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs GLO

37% FI Score
  • glo
  • Mutual Fund
  • Other
  • Tactical Allocation

Clough Global Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 4.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Tactical Allocation Other fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs IHSSX

37% FI Score
  • ihssx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

The Hartford Small Company Fund Class R4

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs PRRFX

37% FI Score
  • prrfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Putnam RetirementReady 2055 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs MNRIX

37% FI Score
  • mnrix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Manning & Napier Real Estate Series Class I

Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs PRPHX

37% FI Score
  • prphx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs WAINX

37% FI Score
  • wainx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • India Stock

Wasatch Emerging India Fund® Investor Class

Expenses: 1.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a India Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs up duo thumbs down duo