FCSSX : Fidelity® Series Commodity Strategy Fund

FCSSX is a Commodities Market Broad with LOW fees.

FCSSX

Fidelity® Series Commodity Strategy Fund

FI Score

86 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

10 /10

Expense Rating

10 /10

Market Score

10 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

10 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,417 Commodities Broad funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare FCSSX vs JSCIX

46% FI Score
  • jscix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

John Hancock Funds II International Small Company Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs CGAFX

46% FI Score
  • cgafx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Calvert Green Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs PQNAX

46% FI Score
  • pqnax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

AllianzGI Mid-Cap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs MIMSX

46% FI Score
  • mimsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

BNY Mellon Mid Cap Multi-Strategy Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs GANYX

46% FI Score
  • ganyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Columbia New York Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class V

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs STVTX

46% FI Score
  • stvtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Virtus Ceredex Large-Cap Value Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs RYPNX

46% FI Score
  • rypnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Royce Opportunity Fund Investment Class

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs CSMZX

46% FI Score
  • csmzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund Class Y

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs CHIX

46% FI Score
  • chix
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Global X MSCI China Financials ETF

Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs ACGKX

46% FI Score
  • acgkx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Invesco Growth and Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs PDSZX

46% FI Score
  • pdszx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

PGIM Short Duration Muni Fund- Class Z

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs QCLN

46% FI Score
  • qcln
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Other

First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs PUDZX

46% FI Score
  • pudzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

PGIM Real Assets Fund- Class Z

Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs MMIBX

46% FI Score
  • mmibx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

MFS Municipal Income Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs TIBCX

46% FI Score
  • tibcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.87% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs CZA

46% FI Score
  • cza
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF

Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs CSB

46% FI Score
  • csb
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

VictoryShares US Small Cap High Div Volatility Wtd ETF

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs RLTSX

46% FI Score
  • rltsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

RiverFront Asset Allocation Aggressive Class Investor II

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs FLADX

46% FI Score
  • fladx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Franklin LifeSmart™ 2040 Retirement Target Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.34% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs AZNAX

46% FI Score
  • aznax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

AllianzGI Income & Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs up duo thumbs down duo