Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$FCSIX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 8,623 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- fasgx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Fidelity Asset Manager® 70% Fund
Expenses: 0.69% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- fhjdx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Fidelity Freedom® Blend 2035 Fund Class K6
Expenses: 0.33% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- bdsax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
BlackRock Advantage Small Cap Core Fund Investor A Shares
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- cagix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Calvert Growth Allocation Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- cfaix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Calvert Conservative Allocation Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.16% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- jmiex
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class L
Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
- jmvax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
Janus Henderson Mid Cap Value Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- ithix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
The Hartford Capital Appreciation Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- jpin
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
JPMorgan Diversified Return International Equity ETF
Expenses: 0.37% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- igaax
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
American Funds International Growth and Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- jspcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Conservative Class T
Expenses: 0.37% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ige
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Energy
iShares North American Natural Resources ETF
Expenses: 0.46% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »
- lttax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.22% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- iuesx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Growth
JPMorgan International Focus Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
- fnidx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
Fidelity® International Sustainability Index Fd
Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- frdpx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- macpx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
BlackRock Balanced Capital Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.53% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- mafgx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
BlackRock Capital Appreciation Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »