FCSIX : Nuveen High Income Bond Fund Class C

FCSIX is a Bond Market High Yield Bond with HIGH fees.

FCSIX

Nuveen High Income Bond Fund Class C

FI Score

18 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

2 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

4 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

4 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare FCSIX vs YAFIX

49% FI Score
  • yafix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

AMG Yacktman Focused Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSIX vs USEQ

49% FI Score
  • useq
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Invesco Russell 1000 Enhanced Equal Weight ETF

Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSIX vs VRAI

49% FI Score
  • vrai
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Virtus Real Asset Income ETF

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSIX vs RZG

49% FI Score
  • rzg
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSIX vs PQIN

49% FI Score
  • pqin
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

PGIM QMA Strategic Alpha International Equity ETF

Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSIX vs TLTE

49% FI Score
  • tlte
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index Fund

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSIX vs VMMSX

49% FI Score
  • vmmsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Vanguard Emerging Markets Select Stock Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSIX vs PRRZX

49% FI Score
  • prrzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Putnam RetirementReady 2040 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSIX vs PSCU

49% FI Score
  • pscu
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Communication Services

Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF

Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Communication Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FCSIX vs REEAX

49% FI Score
  • reeax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

RBC Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSIX vs RIPNX

49% FI Score
  • ripnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Royce International Premier Fund Investment Class

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSIX vs RYF

49% FI Score
  • ryf
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FCSIX vs SCGVX

49% FI Score
  • scgvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Sands Capital Global Growth Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSIX vs SSMJX

49% FI Score
  • ssmjx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSIX vs TAICX

49% FI Score
  • taicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

American Funds Tax-Aware Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSIX vs TCAAX

49% FI Score
  • tcaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Thrivent Moderately Conservative Allocation Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSIX vs QQXT

49% FI Score
  • qqxt
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

First Trust NASDAQ-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSIX vs BMCAX

49% FI Score
  • bmcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Growth Fund Investor A Shares

Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSIX vs RBIN

49% FI Score
  • rbin
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Nationwide Risk-Based International Equity ETF

Expenses: 0.42% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSIX vs MDLVX

49% FI Score
  • mdlvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Value Fund Investor A Shares

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo