FCQAX : Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund Class A

FCQAX is a Bond Market Municipal Bond with HIGH fees.

FCQAX

Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund Class A

FI Score

54 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

2 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond Municipal Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare FCQAX vs PFSMX

24% FI Score
  • pfsmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

PFG MFS Aggressive Growth Strategy Fund Class R

Expenses: 2.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCQAX vs CHASX

24% FI Score
  • chasx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Chase Growth Fund Class N Shares

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCQAX vs MIDZX

24% FI Score
  • midzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

DWS ESG Core Equity Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCQAX vs PJRCX

24% FI Score
  • pjrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

PGIM QMA International Equity Fund- Class C

Expenses: 2.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCQAX vs CIHCX

24% FI Score
  • cihcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Cullen International High Dividend Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCQAX vs MSSLX

24% FI Score
  • msslx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Inception Portfolio Class L

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCQAX vs COBYX

24% FI Score
  • cobyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

The Cook & Bynum Fund

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCQAX vs COICX

24% FI Score
  • coicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Calvert International Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCQAX vs PVIVX

24% FI Score
  • pvivx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Paradigm Micro-Cap Fund

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCQAX vs CPER

24% FI Score
  • cper
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

United States Copper Index Fund, LP

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare FCQAX vs RYCQX

24% FI Score
  • rycqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

Rydex Inverse Russell 2000® Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare FCQAX vs SUVBX

24% FI Score
  • suvbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

PGIM QMA Large-Cap Value Fund- Class B

Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCQAX vs TSLCX

24% FI Score
  • tslcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Transamerica Small Cap Value C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCQAX vs SLCGX

24% FI Score
  • slcgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth Portfolio Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCQAX vs SSCDX

24% FI Score
  • sscdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCQAX vs SSVSX

24% FI Score
  • ssvsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Victory Special Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCQAX vs DGBCX

24% FI Score
  • dgbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

BNY Mellon Global Real Estate Securities Fund - Class C

Expenses: 2.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FCQAX vs DRESX

24% FI Score
  • dresx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCQAX vs YXI

24% FI Score
  • yxi
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares Short FTSE China 50

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare FCQAX vs DVECX

24% FI Score
  • dvecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Delaware Select Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo