Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$FCFAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- apecx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Columbia High Yield Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ifrax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Voya Floating Rate Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dhhax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Diamond Hill High Yield Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- phsax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO High Yield Spectrum Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ncoax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Nuveen Symphony High Yield Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- rsflx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Victory Floating Rate Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- smrsx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
ALPS/Smith Short Duration Bond Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nshax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Neuberger Berman Short Duration Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ecsix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »