Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$FCFAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- jahyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Janus Henderson High-Yield Fund Class T
Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- smdsx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
ALPS/Smith Short Duration Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- jsocx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
JPMorgan Strategic Income Opportunities Fund Class C Shares
Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- cubix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Calvert Flexible Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.67% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- rinf
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF
Expenses: 0.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- lsst
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Natixis Loomis Sayles Short Duration Income ETF
Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hysax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PGIM Short Duration High Yield Income Fund- Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- winc
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Western Asset Short Duration Income ETF
Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- gobax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Opportunities Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »