• ptbax
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Target-Date

Principal LifeTime 2020 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

• trrux
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Target-Date

T. Rowe Price Target 2020 Fund

Expenses: 0.14% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

• smtax
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Target-Date

JPMorgan SmartRetirement® 2040 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

• ptdax
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Target-Date

Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

• mltax
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Target-Date

MFS Lifetime 2030 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.23% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

• fhtkx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Target-Date

Fidelity Freedom® 2040 Fund Class K6

Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

• fjtkx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Target-Date

Fidelity Freedom® 2045 Fund Class K6

Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

• jsaax
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Target-Date

JPMorgan SmartRetirement® 2045 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

• jtsax
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Target-Date

JPMorgan SmartRetirement® 2050 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

• mlfax
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Target-Date

MFS Lifetime 2040 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.24% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »