Diversification Rating
0 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
6 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
7 /10
$EZM Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 8,161 US Stocks Mid-Cap Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- tacix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Transamerica Asset Allocation Conservative Portfolio Class I
Expenses: 0.27% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- trigx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Value
T. Rowe Price International Value Equity Fund
Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
- jsmax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
JPMorgan SmartRetirement® 2030 Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- jttax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
JPMorgan SmartRetirement® 2020 Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.36% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- lijax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
BlackRock LifePath® Index 2035 Fund Investor A Shares
Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- lilax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
BlackRock LifePath® Index 2025 Fund Investor A Shares
Expenses: 0.36% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- dfpax
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
BNY Mellon Diversified International Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- ibmk
- ETF
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
iShares iBonds Dec 2022 Term Muni Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fatkx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Fidelity Freedom® 2020 Fund Class K6
Expenses: 0.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- fdtkx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Fidelity Freedom® 2025 Fund Class K6
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- ibdq
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF
Expenses: 0.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ifafx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
American Funds The Income Fund of America® Class F-1
Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- cwgix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
American Funds Capital World Growth and Income Fund® Class A
Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- fajtx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
American Funds 2055 Target Date Retirement Fund® Class F-1
Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- intf
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Intl ETF
Expenses: 0.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- hqbyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Hartford Quality Bond Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.02% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- jbalx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- jcaix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Conservative Class I
Expenses: 0.21% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »