• chim
• ETF
• International Stocks
• China Stock

Global X MSCI China Materials ETF

Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

• hulcx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• Municipal Bond

Hawaiian Tax-Free Trust Class C

Expenses: 1.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

• fbacx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• All-In-One

AIG Active Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

• gsxcx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Small Growth

Aberdeen U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

• gvcax
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Mid-Cap Blend

Gabelli Value 25 Fund Class AAA

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• hghax
• Mutual Fund
• Sector Equity
• Healthcare

The Hartford Healthcare Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

• alhax
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

AB Limited Duration High Income Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• gliax
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Target-Date

AllianzGI Retirement 2055 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

• famfx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Small Blend

FAM Small Cap Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• fbabx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• All-In-One

AIG Active Allocation Fund Class B

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »