Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
1 /10
Market Score
8 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
8 /10
We found 11,127 Alternative Inverse funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
Eaton Vance Greater China Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
Eaton Vance New York Municipal Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Saturna Sustainable Equity Fund
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Wells Fargo International Equity Fund - Class A
Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
Semper MBS Total Return Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
ACM Dynamic Opportunity Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
1919 Maryland Tax-Free Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Growth Fund I Class
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
Diamond Hill Small Mid Cap Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
Artisan Value Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2024 Adam Fortuna
Site Map