Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
1 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$ETIMX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 748 Allocation All-In-One funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- weacx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Wells Fargo WealthBuilder Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- htayx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Highland Total Return Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- jpvtx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Janus Henderson Value Plus Income Fund Class T
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- mbeax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
AMG GW&K Global Allocation Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- mblax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Madison Diversified Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- agiax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
AB Tax-Managed All Market Income Portfolio Class A
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- hwacx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- mbnbx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
MainStay Balanced Fund Class B
Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- cmalx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Crawford Multi-Asset Income Fund
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »