Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
8 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
8 /10
$ETILX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- tefqx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Technology
Firsthand Technology Opportunities Fund
Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- thycx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Touchstone High Yield Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- tmnax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- tnacx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Invesco Balanced-Risk Retirement 2030 Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- uipix
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Inverse
ProFunds UltraShort Mid-Cap Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »
- userx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Basic Materials
U.S. Global Investors Gold and Precious Metals Fund
Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »
- vrecx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Invesco Balanced-Risk Retirement 2030 Fund Class CX
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- whycx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Wells Fargo High Yield Municipal Bond Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- xmpt
- ETF
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
VanEck Vectors CEF Municipal Income ETF
Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »