ETCDX : Eventide Dividend Opportunities Fund Class C Shares

ETCDX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Blend with HIGH fees.

ETCDX

Eventide Dividend Opportunities Fund Class C Shares

FI Score

17 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

2 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

2 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,161 US Stocks Mid-Cap Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ETCDX vs LMMDX

35% FI Score
  • lmmdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

1919 Maryland Tax-Free Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ETCDX vs EVCGX

35% FI Score
  • evcgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Eaton Vance Greater China Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ETCDX vs ARWCX

35% FI Score
  • arwcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2025 Portfolio C Class

Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ETCDX vs FRGOX

35% FI Score
  • frgox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ETCDX vs SHYPX

35% FI Score
  • shypx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

American Beacon SiM High Yield Opportunities Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ETCDX vs ARKQ

35% FI Score
  • arkq
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ETCDX vs ARGNX

35% FI Score
  • argnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2060 Portfolio I Class

Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ETCDX vs ARDMX

35% FI Score
  • ardmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2040 Portfolio A Class

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ETCDX vs THYYX

35% FI Score
  • thyyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Touchstone High Yield Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ETCDX vs ARANX

35% FI Score
  • aranx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Horizon Active Risk Assist® Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ETCDX vs EKWDX

35% FI Score
  • ekwdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Wells Fargo Precious Metals Fund - Class Admin

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ETCDX vs AOTAX

35% FI Score
  • aotax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

AllianzGI Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ETCDX vs WFEDX

35% FI Score
  • wfedx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Wells Fargo International Equity Fund - Class Admin

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ETCDX vs ANHIX

35% FI Score
  • anhix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ETCDX vs MWCBX

35% FI Score
  • mwcbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Metropolitan West Corporate Bond Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ETCDX vs GDMIX

35% FI Score
  • gdmix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Lazard Global Dynamic Multi-Asset Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ETCDX vs HGHYX

35% FI Score
  • hghyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

The Hartford Healthcare Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ETCDX vs AMHYX

35% FI Score
  • amhyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco High Yield Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ETCDX vs FIRNX

35% FI Score
  • firnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Fidelity Simplicity RMD Income Fund

Expenses: 0.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ETCDX vs MSDLX

35% FI Score
  • msdlx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Global Strategist Portfolio Class L

Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo