ESGS : Columbia Sustainable U.S. Equity Income ETF

ESGS is a US Stocks Market Large Value with LOW fees.

ESGS

Columbia Sustainable U.S. Equity Income ETF

FI Score

43 /100

Diversification Rating

2 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

7 /10

Market Score

0 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

0 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,043 US Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ESGS vs USSCX

35% FI Score
  • usscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

USAA Science & Technology Fund

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ESGS vs PST

35% FI Score
  • pst
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ESGS vs OOSCX

35% FI Score
  • ooscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Senior Floating Rate Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ESGS vs MCYHX

35% FI Score
  • mcyhx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

BlackRock High Yield Municipal Fund Investor C Shares

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ESGS vs UAEMX

35% FI Score
  • uaemx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

USAA Emerging Markets Fund Adviser Shares

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ESGS vs OIBCX

35% FI Score
  • oibcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer International Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ESGS vs PTHYX

35% FI Score
  • pthyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Putnam Tax-Free High Yield Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ESGS vs DSBFX

35% FI Score
  • dsbfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Domini Impact Bond Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ESGS vs NWAGX

35% FI Score
  • nwagx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Nationwide AllianzGI International Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ESGS vs AIOIX

35% FI Score
  • aioix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

American Century International Opportunities Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ESGS vs NNCIX

35% FI Score
  • nncix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Columbia North Carolina Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ESGS vs THYYX

35% FI Score
  • thyyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Touchstone High Yield Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ESGS vs ETIHX

35% FI Score
  • etihx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Eventide Healthcare & Life Sciences Fund CLASS I SHARES

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ESGS vs NFRAX

35% FI Score
  • nfrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Nuveen Symphony Floating Rate Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ESGS vs JJU

35% FI Score
  • jju
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

iPath Series B Bloomberg Aluminum Subindex Total Return ETN

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare ESGS vs XPP

35% FI Score
  • xpp
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ESGS vs MSCKX

35% FI Score
  • msckx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Core Plus Fixed Income Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ESGS vs GSAGX

35% FI Score
  • gsagx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Goldman Sachs China Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ESGS vs HQBAX

35% FI Score
  • hqbax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Hartford Quality Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ESGS vs MQLCX

35% FI Score
  • mqlcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

MFS Limited Maturity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo