Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
5 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
5 /10
$ESGMX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- palcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
AllianzGI Global Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- nwwox
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Virtus Vontobel Global Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- jvgtx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Janus Henderson Adaptive Global Allocation Fund Class T
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gdmix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Lazard Global Dynamic Multi-Asset Portfolio Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- evgbx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Evermore Global Value Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- wtmvx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Segall Bryant & Hamill Global Large Cap Fund Retail Class
Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- naefx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
New Alternatives Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ggsox
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Grandeur Peak Global Stalwarts Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- awscx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Invesco Global Core Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »