Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
1 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$ESFAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- phymx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Putnam High Yield Fund Class M
Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- agivx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Income Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- rldax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Victory INCORE Low Duration Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ncinx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Nicholas High Income Fund Class Institutional
Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fhytx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Federated High Yield Trust Service Shares
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fhyax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Federated High Yield Trust Class A
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- emkax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Ashmore Emerging Markets Total Return Fund A Class
Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- esicx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Wells Fargo International Bond Fund - Class Inst
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- eshix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Eaton Vance Short Duration High Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »