Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
5 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
5 /10
$ESECX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 643 US Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- sopvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Wells Fargo Opportunity Fund - Class A
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- pnocx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- eseax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital Select Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- pjfbx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
PGIM Jennison Growth Fund- Class B
Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- rpeax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Davis Opportunity Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- plaax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
PACE Large Co Growth Equity Investments Class A
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- mrlsx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
AMG Renaissance Large Cap Growth Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- apdtx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Artisan Focus Fund Advisor Shares
Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- wgfcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Wells Fargo Growth Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »